Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor and Kennado Kinte Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe, Gonzalez, Sgt Bogdala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kennado K Taylor
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Kristen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Ploden et al
as 1:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Mr. Ploden, Mr. Barry, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01608
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Tom Dart, John Doe, Sgt Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. Sgt Mr Cukaj et al
as 1:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Sgt Mr Cukaj, John Doe Officer and Lt. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennado Taylor v. Criston Alearez, et al
as 22-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNADO K. TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
CRISTON ALEAREZ, THOMAS J. DART, Sheriff of Cook County, Illinois, sued in his individual and official capacity, JOHN/JANE DOE, Nurses and others
Taylor v. Filipiak et al
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Filipiak, Ms. Cooper, John Doe Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cortez et al
as 1:2021cv06828
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Sgt Mr Cortez, John Doe and John
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Alearez et al
as 1:2021cv06559
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
Criston Alearez, John Doe Jane Doe Nurses, John Doe Jane Doe Sgt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv05996
Plaintiff:
Kennado K. Taylor
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
