Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Moore v. Henderson, et al.
as 24-983
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J MOORE
Defendant:
RICHARD L HENDERSON, MD, TIMOTHY G CAUDILL, MD, SIR REYES, PA and others
Moore v. Henderson et al
as 4:2023cv05142
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J Moore
Defendant:
Richard L Henderson, MD, Timothy G Caudill, MD, Sir Reyes, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2023cv01402
Plaintiff:
Ryan Sanders
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, LA Dept of Safety & Corrections, Marcus Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. LA Dept of Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Dale Brown
Defendant:
Louisiana Dept of Safety & Corrections, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Marcus Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Holbrook
as 3:2023cv05058
Petitioner:
Kenneth J Moore
Respondent:
Donald R Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Holbrook
as 4:2022cv05170
Petitioner:
Kenneth J Moore
Respondent:
Donald Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cothren et al v. The Little Mint, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00985
Plaintiff:
Cade Cothren and Ava Korby
Defendant:
The Little Mint, Inc., Moon Unit, Inc. and Kenneth K. Moore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Kenneth Moore
as 22-4184
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH EARL MOORE, a/k/a Miami
Moore v. Superintendent of Walla Walla Penitentiary et al
as 4:2021cv05140
Petitioner:
Kenneth J Moore
Defendant:
Superintendent of Walla Walla Penitentiary, Correction Officer 7819 and Correction Officer 7400
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
