Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kenneth Burnam v. Dennis Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-16860
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH BURNAM, AKA James Roe
Defendant - Appellee: DENNIS R. SMITH, former Warden, FCI Phoenix, in his individual capacity, CARL EVANS, former Senior Union Representative/Food Service Supervisor, FCI Phoenix, in his individual capacity, D. GIFFORD, Captain, FCI Phoenix, in his individual capacity and others
Burnam v. Fisher We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00552
Petitioner: Kenneth Burnam
Respondent: S.P. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Burnam v. USP Lompoc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00128
Petitioner: Kenneth Burnam
Respondent: USP Lompoc , Linda Sanders and T Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenneth Burnam v. USP Lompoc et al
as 2:2012cv00263
Petitioner: Kenneth Burnam
Respondent: T Jones, Linda Sanders and USP Lompoc
Burnam v. USP Lompoc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00043
Petitioner: Kenneth Burnam
Respondent: USP Lompoc , Linda Sanders and Olivia Magana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kenneth Burnam v. USP Lompoc et al
as 2:2011cv10101
Petitioner: Kenneth Burnam
Respondent: Olivia Magana, Linda Sanders and USP Lompoc
USA v. Kenneth Burnam
as 11-1095
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH BURNAM
Kenneth Burnam v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 08-3956
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENNETH BURNAM
Defendant - Appellee: BUR PRISONS, HELEN J. MARBERRY, MCKEAN FCI and others
USA v. Kenneth Burnam
as 08-3557
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: KENNETH BURNAM
Burnam v. USA
as 1:2007cv00876
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Kenneth Burnam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?