Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Barbour v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 13-3023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant - Appellee:
Attorney General of Virginia
Barbour v. Attorney General Of The U.S.
as 2:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Attorney General Of The U.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Virginia Department of Corrections Western Regional Director
as 7:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections Western Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. District Attorneys of San Antonio, Texas et al
as 5:2012cv00633
Defendant:
Attorney General of Texas and District Attorneys of San Antonio, Texas
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barbour v. Attorney General of Virginia
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Attorney General of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Attorney General of Ohio
as 5:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Attorney General of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Holder
as 12-1510
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual and official capacities as U.S. Attorney General
Kenneth Barbour v. 43rd United States President
as 12-5127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant - Appellee:
43rd United States President
Kenneth Barbour v. U.S. Courthouse, Central Distr
as 12-55614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH EDWARD BARBOUR
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. COURTHOUSE, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Barbour v. VDOC et al
as 7:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Director, VDOC Western Regional, Seg. Gibson, Lt. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
