Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Smith v. Marshall et al
as 2:2026cv03380
Petitioner:
Kenneth Earl Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
William K. Marshall, III and Chad Boardman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. Lester Smith
as 26-2732
Plaintiff:
VALERIE FLORES
Defendant:
KENNETH LESTER SMITH, SAMANTHA SUSSEK SMITH, MELISSA JOHNSON SMITH and others
Lewis v. Smith
as 4:2026cv04074
Plaintiff:
Sarah J Lewis
Defendant:
Kenneth R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Smith v. Kalamazoo County Circuit Court
as 1:2026cv02535
Petitioner:
Kenneth Clarence Smith
Respondent:
Kalamazoo County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04662
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03647
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03646
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03348
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Indivior Solutions, Inc., et al.
as 1:2026sf65056
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Smith
Defendant:
INDIVIOR SOLUTIONS, INC.,, Indivior Inc and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a MonoSol RX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02779
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
