Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Moore v. Adamski et al
as 3:2026cv00898
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Defendant:
C/O Adamski, John W. Barwick, C/O Redding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Andrews et al
as 3:2026cv00814
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Defendant:
Food Supervisor Andrews, IDOC, John W. Barwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv00815
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Defendant:
Food Supervisor Marshall, Maintenance Department, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. IDOC et al
as 3:2026cv00813
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Moore
Defendant:
IDOC, Food Supervisor Grant and Maintenance Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Raymond Laborde Correctional Center et al
as 1:2026cv01439
Plaintiff:
Nathan Jackson
Defendant:
Raymond Laborde Correctional Center, Gary Westscott, Brent Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston-Corson v. City of Gold Beach et al
as 1:2025cv01258
Plaintiff:
Sharon Johnston-Corson
Defendant:
City of Gold Beach and Kenneth Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore
as 5:2025cv03776
Petitioner:
Kenneth Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. McComber et al
as 5:2025cv03458
Petitioner:
Kenneth Moore
Respondent:
Jeffery McComber and Teauna Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE v. WRITEAPRISONER.COM
as 1:2025cv00055
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOORE, JR
Defendant:
WRITEAPRISONER.COM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Johnson (McCallum)
as 24-2143
Defendant:
JAMES JOHNSON, Flizzy, GERALD MARTIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
