Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Brumfield v. Tri-Arc Food Systems, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Troy Brumfield
Defendant:
Tri-Arc Food Systems, Inc., Kenny Avery and Tri-Arc Food Systems, Inc. d/b/a Bojangles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Criterion Supply Solutions, LLC v. Kenny's Candy & Confections, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Criterion Supply Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Kenny's Candy & Confections, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2023cv00952
Petitioner:
KENNY LASALLE TAYLOR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sapp v. Audi of Charlotte et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Audi of Charlotte, Karen Smith, Nancy Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Belton v. Wake County Police Department et al
as 5:2022ct03093
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hilton Belton
Defendant:
Wake County Police Department, Kevin Gablemann and Kenny Gablemann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kebede v. Butner FCI Prison Low Unit et al
as 5:2020ct03330
Defendant:
Lieutenant Steiner, Mr. Metziger, Lieutenant Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Adane Kebede
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAYLOR
as 1:2019cv01044
Petitioner:
KENNY LASALLE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2019cv00947
Petitioner:
KENNY LASALLE TAYLOR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martin v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00185
Defendant:
Harrah's NC Casino Company, LLC and Brooks Robinson
Plaintiff:
Kenny Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
