Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Schell v. Gurich, et al
as 20-6044
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. FIELDS, member, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors, JUSTICE JAMES E. EDMONDSON, Associate Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court, JOHN MORRIS WILLIAMS, Executive Director, Oklahoma Bar Association and Secretary/Treasurer, Oklahoma Bar Association Board of Governors and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK E. SCHELL
Kenyon Williams v. Apollo Education Group, Inc.
as 2:2019cv05931
Defendant:
Apollo Education Group, Inc. and Apollo Education Group, Inc. doing business as University of Phoenix
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
In re: Kenyon Williams
as 19-10519
Undetermined:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: KENYON WILLIAMS
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
In re: Kenyon Williams
as 18-13293
Petitioner:
In re: KENYON WILLIAMS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
Brande L Samuels
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Bar Association City of Tulsa, Tulsa County District Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenyon Williams v. USA
as 17-11566
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENYON WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv02820
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Kenyon Williams
as 14-10891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENYON WILLIAMS
Williams v. Ray, Jr.
as 1:2013cv02122
Plaintiff:
Kenyon Williams
Defendant:
Officer Owen M. Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
