Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robinson v. Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Robinson
Defendant:
Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Jeffrey Kepler and Jerry Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harry Kepler v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02365
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Kepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kepler v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15182
Plaintiff:
Denise Kepler
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Alpha Natural Resources, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11609
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of West Virginia , West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and others
Defendant:
Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Alpha Appalachia Holdings, Inc., Alex Energy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Gibson et al v. Fallon Benefits Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
Claudine W. Gibson and Gibson Insurance Agency, LLC
Defendant:
Fallon Benefits Group, Inc. and Jeffrey Kepler Layman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Kepler
as 2:2009mc00004
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Russell M. Kepler
USA v. Kepler
as 2:2009mc00003
Petitioner:
USA
Respondent:
Russell M. Kepler
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kepler
as 2:2008mc00003
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
William Kepler, Jr.
Kepler Processing Company, LLC v. New Market Land Company
as 5:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kepler Processing Company, LLC, Kepler Processing Company, LLC, Kepler Processing Company, LLC and others
Defendant:
New Market Land Company and Road Fork Development Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
