Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barker v. Johnson et al
as 4:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Bradly Eugene Barker
Defendant:
Rebecca Johnson, Ann Fort, Keri Smith and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Teague et al v. Howard Memorial Hospital
as 4:2023cv04016
Plaintiff:
Keri Teague and Jason Teague
Defendant:
Howard Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hickey v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00933
Plaintiff:
Keri Hickey
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Merdinian et al
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brayon Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Riley Merdinian, Ashley Davis, Nathan Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Frakes et al
as 8:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robertson
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Harbans Deol and Keri Pedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jo Anne Saucier, et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc., et al
as 22-1460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jo Anne Saucier, Cheryle Hanzel, Julie Johnson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Defendant:
Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and Doe Manufacturers, 1-100
Henry v. Mannis et al
as 2:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Craig Lamont Henry
Defendant:
Dean Mannis, Jeremiah Richards, Keshun Gaddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmons v. Mannis et al
as 2:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Keri Dorcell Timmons
Defendant:
Dean Mannis and Patricia Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
