Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Rodgers et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv06974
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers, Howard Jackson, Stephanie Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Richardson El v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Richardson El
Defendant:
Mikell Scarborough d/b/a Charleston County/County of Charleston Master in Equity, Kristin Graziano d/b/a Charleston County/ County of Charleston Sheriff, John Kay d/b/a Hutchens Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Brown v. Nguyen, et al
as 1:2022cv03250
Plaintiff:
wayne kevin brown
Defendant:
christopher Nguyen, Kenneth M Somers, Franklin Phipps and others
Cause Of Action: DO NOT USE 28:1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv02042
Defendant:
SSC Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brown
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Kevin Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6044
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Brown v. Clarke
as 1:2016cv00340
Petitioner:
Kevin Brown
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Kevin Brown
as 15-4199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN BROWN, a/k/a KB
Aaron Roberts v. Warren Pruitt
as 14-7392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON B. ROBERTS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN PRUITT, Case Manager, KEVIN BROWN, Case Manager and GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, Secretary
Roberts v. Priutt et al
as 1:2013cv03604
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Roberts
Defendant:
Warren Priutt, Kevin Brown and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
