Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Butts v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kevin Butts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Acerno et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11575
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Acosta, John Closs, Elizabeth Ambrosino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
DOUGLAS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2017cv04647
Respondent:
KEVIN BUTTS and CURTIS HILL
Petitioner:
MONWELL DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOUGLAS v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2017cv04368
Defendant:
R. BLAIR, KEVIN BUTTS, MARY CECIL and others
Plaintiff:
MONWELL DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antoine Jones v. Steve Kirchner, et al
as 15-5088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Kirchner, D.C. MPD Detective, Joseph Sopata, D.C. MPD Detective, Stephen Naugle, F.B.I. Agent and others
Antoine Jones v. Steve Kirchner, et al
as 14-5257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antoine Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Kirchner, D.C. MPD Detective, Joseph Sopata, D.C. MPD Detective, Stephen Naugle, F.B.I. Agent and others
Butts v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kevin Butts
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GETTER v. LEMON et al
as 1:2013cv01190
Defendant:
KEVIN BUTTS, ADAM DEMING, DAVID DONHUE and others
Plaintiff:
TRACEY GETTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Butts
as 1:2010cv00684
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Martin
Defendant:
Lloyd Kevin Butts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
