Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 5:2017cv05004
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 5:2016cv05111
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery, et al et al
as 1:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, et al and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 4:2016cv00607
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Knox v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 16-1074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher George Knox
Defendant - Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Governor, State of Arkansas, Kevin Murphy, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Community Correction and Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Knox v. Hutchison et al
as 4:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Knox
Defendant:
Asa Hutchison, Kevin Murphy and Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bison Advisors v. Irvin Kessler, et al
as 14-3638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bison Advisors, a Minnesota limited liability company
Defendant Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
Irvin Kessler, Peter Goddard and Walleye Trading Advisors LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company
Third Party Defendant:
Ephraim Gildor, Kevin Murphy and Argos Capital Management Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
