Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Gilbert v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv01771
Defendant:
Kevin Peters, FMS Law Group Company, Kathryn McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
John G Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong-Temple et al v. City of Berkeley et al
as 4:2017cv06774
Defendant:
City of Berkeley, Andrew Rateaver, Peter Hong and others
Plaintiff:
Nanci Armstrong-Temple , Barbara Brust and Michelle Lot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Newkirk v. General Assembly
as 16-7480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY, SUPREME COURT, TERRY MCAULIFFE, Governor and others
Kevin Ward v. EZPW, et al
as 16-14280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN PETER WARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
EZCORP, INC. and EZPAWN FLORIDA, INC., d.b.a. Value Pawn and Jewelry
Kenneth Newkirk v. Artisha Gregg
as 16-6623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTISHA GREGG, Hampton Commonwealth of Virginia, MR. HUFF, Chief Judge, MR. DECKER, Judge and others
Peters v. Cilacox et al
as 4:2015cv03208
Petitioner:
Brshai Kevin Peters
Respondent:
Cilacox, Crow, B Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. EZCorp, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peter Ward
Defendant:
EZCorp, Inc. and Value Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. LoanDepot.com, LLC
as 6:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Kevin Peter Ward
Defendant:
LoanDepot.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
McGhie v. Fidelity National Insurance Company et al
as 4:2013cv00645
Plaintiff:
Charmaine McGhie
Defendant:
Fidelity National Insurance Company and Kevin Peters
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Zeran Peters v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-60443
Petitioner:
ZERAN JOHN KEVIN PETERS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
