Cases 81 - 90 of 191
KFC Corporation et al v. Wagstaff et al
as 3:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
KFC Corporation and KFC U.S. Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
Denman E. Wagstaff , Donald Steinke , Alyce J. Wagstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAMMONTON INVESTORS, LLC v. KFC CORPORATION et al
as 1:2011cv06719
Plaintiff:
HAMMONTON INVESTORS, LLC
Defendant:
KFC CORPORATION and KFC OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KFC Corporation v. Smile Foods Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00638
Plaintiff:
KFC Corporation
Defendant:
Smile Foods Inc., Ismail Kazi and Nahid Kazi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv14913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KFC Corporation v. Royster Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2011cv14862
Plaintiff:
KFC Corporation
Defendant:
Royster Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
KFC Corporation v. Wood Family Foods, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00614
Plaintiff:
KFC Corporation
Defendant:
Wood Family Foods, Inc, Thomas B. Wood and Laura A. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
In Re: Kazi Foods of Michigan, et al
as 11-107
Petitioner:
In re: KAZI FOODS OF FLORIDA, INCORPORATED, KAZI FOODS OF NEW YORK, INCORPORATED, KAZI FOODS OF ANNAPOLIS, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
KFC CORPORATION, KFC, GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv02450
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
KFC Corporation v. Texas Petroplex, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00479
Plaintiff:
KFC Corporation
Defendant:
Texas Petroplex, Inc. , Mohammad Tatari , Naim Tatari and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
