Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Montoya v. The Theo MT Thai LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Ever Montoya
Defendant:
The Theo MT Thai LLC, Thanida Nguyen and Khoa Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
NGUYEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85820
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KHOA NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen et al v. First Protective Insurance Company
as 7:2020cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Nguyen and Khoa Nguyen
Defendant:
First Protective Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NGUYEN et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2020cv00718
Plaintiff:
ANH KHOI NGUYEN, THI BICH DUYEN DO, ANH TUAN NGUYEN and others
Defendant:
DAN KRITENBRINK, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Vaughan et al v. Kuroshio, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02067
Plaintiff:
Sarah Vaughan , Anthony Davis and Jennifer Rivas
Defendant:
Kuroshio, Inc. , Kuroshio II, Inc. and Khoa Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.
as 12-56628
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN KHOA NGUYEN, an individual, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
BARNES & NOBLE INC.
Kevin Khoa Nguyen v. Barnes and Noble Inc et al
as 8:2012cv00812
Defendant:
Barnes and Noble Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Kevin Khoa Nguyen
US v. 4219 University Drive, Fairfax
as 12-1321
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Party In Interest:
KHOA NGUYEN
Party-in-Interest - Appellant:
DUYGU KIVANC and TURAN KIVANC
Defendant:
4219 UNIVERSITY DRIVE, FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA and $28,534.22 IN FUNDS SEIZED FROM PNC BANK ACCOUNT NO. ENDING IN 4269
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
