Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
Joseph Gargan v. Vicky Moser
as 23-7106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH E. GARGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
VICKY MOSER, KIM SWINDELL, DONALD EPPLEY and others
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
MR. MACKIE JAMES WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MS. ROBIN GOLDEN, MR. NORMAN WEIDLICH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gargan v. Moser et al
as 5:2022ct03354
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Gargan
Defendant:
Vicky Moser, Kim Swindell, Donald Eppley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
DOE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2021cv00022
Defendant:
FCI LORETTO WARDEN MOSER, DR. KIM SWINDELL, HSA NORMAN WEIDLICH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
THOMAS v. MARTYNUSKA et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
P.A. GOLDEN, C.O. JOZWIAK, LT. ROBISON and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BURNSIDE v. SWINDELL et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Defendant:
STEPHANIE HOOVER and DR. KIM SWINDELL
Plaintiff:
JOHN OTIS BURNSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE , M. ROBINOWITZ , J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv02163
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE, M. ROBINOWITZ, J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
DONALD TURNER
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., MARK KIRBY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
