Cases 1 - 10 of 569
Myers v. City of Frankfort et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Myers
Defendant:
City of Frankfort, Dustin Bowman and Larry G. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reguli et al v. Hetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli and Wendy Hancock
Defendant:
Tracy Hetzel, Estate of Kimberly Helper, Mary Katherine Evins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Dunlap v. Knox County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Davis Dunlap
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Department, Roger D Wilson Detention Facility and C Tuell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Vance v. Frisco
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Marvin D Vance
Defendant:
Kimberly Frisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyllan Rives, et al v. University of Tennessee, et al
as 24-5336
Plaintiff:
DYLLAN RIVES and JAMES R. RIVES
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, DONDE PLOWMAN, Individually and as Chancellor, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Hom v. HOV Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv10601
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY HOM
Defendant:
HOV Services, Inc., EXELA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Exela Technologies, Inc
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
