Cases 1 - 10 of 473
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
King et al v. Quad-R, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dillon King and Allison King
Defendant:
Quad-R, Inc. doing business as Rae Products Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shabazz v. King
as 1:2024cv00488
Defendant:
Mayor Brandon King
Plaintiff:
Lateek Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rachel Kaltenbach, et al v. Hilliard City Schools, et al
as 24-3336
Plaintiff:
RACHEL KALTENBACH, DANIEL KAMENTO, SARAH KAMENTO and others
Defendant:
HILLIARD CITY SCHOOLS, HILLIARD CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, BETH MURDOCH, in her official capacity as Board President for the Hilliard City Schools Board of Education and others
King v. 17th Judicial Drug Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
David Michael King
Defendant:
17th Judicial Drug Task Force, Steven Daugherty and Casey Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
King v. Accell Schools LLC
as 4:2023cv13308
Plaintiff:
Antonio King
Defendant:
Accell Schools LLC, Nicole Arnold and Pamela Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
