Cases 31 - 40 of 102
JEWISH v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
KING JEW JEWISH and DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00358
Petitioner:
Danny King
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KREILEIN v. HORTH et al
as 1:2019cv00749
Defendant:
DAVID SLOAN, GWENDOLYN HORTH, CURTIS T. HILL, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. BREEN et al
as 1:2019cv00641
Defendant:
AMBER KING, BRANDON RICHIE, JOSHUA SHAVERS and others
Plaintiff:
KALEFE MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. SAINT PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00598
Defendant:
BOB STELLER, MOBILE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT INC., EDDIE CURRAN and others
Plaintiff:
EDMOND HUDMOND SMITH, IV and LOUIS HOLGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. KING et al
as 1:2018cv03470
Plaintiff:
NATHAN L. ADAMS
Defendant:
JOEL LYTTLE, BRIAN MARTZ, JEFF KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL PROVIDER, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03165
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, TOM RICHARDSON, CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LAMONT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv01984
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE (WITNESS), JOHN DOE (OFFICER) and others
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAYLOR v. KING
as 1:2018cv01895
Defendant:
JEFFREY KING
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCASTER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2018cv00251
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, D. ARONLD, LAURA BODKIN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOE MCCASTER
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
