Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00011
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lin v. BICKMAN et al
as 5:2019cv00020
Defendant:
Walde PHIL BICKMAN, Acting Director THOMAS D HOMAN, Secretary of DHS KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
Jinzhong Lin and JIN ZHONG LIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Xu v. Barr, et al
as 19-1044
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS BROPHY, Assistant Field Office Director, KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
LIQUN XU, a/k/a Dan Xu
Abed v. Rogers et al
as 7:2019cv00239
Respondent:
Debra A Rogers, Lee Francis Cisna, Kirstjen Michele NIELSEN and others
Petitioner:
Nabela Abed
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
De Souza v. Barr, et al
as 19-1028
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN MICHELE NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO BENTO DE SOUZA
v. Whitaker et al
as 4:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Director L. Francis Cissna, Secretary Kirstjen Michelle Nielsen, Acting Attorney Gral Matthew Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jiang v. Cioppa et al
as 1:2019cv00018
Plaintiff:
Xinzhou Jiang
Defendant:
District Director Thomas Cioppa, Secretary of DHS Kirstjen Michele Nielsen and Director L. Francis Cissna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11923
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv25247
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
