Cases 1 - 10 of 78
SCUTELLA v. TRINITY FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
TRINITY FOOD SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDLEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
JEROME KEON GARDLEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DOCTOR KOHLER, PA KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GARZON v. EXICURE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20912
Plaintiff:
DIEGO GARZON
Defendant:
EXICURE, INC., PAUL KANG, JIYOUNG HWANG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wang et al v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
Kaiying Wang and Xiu Quing Kang
Defendant:
Progressive Insurance Company and PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
KO v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
as 2:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
EUNBIN KO
Defendant:
HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PIRIR v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
as 2:2023cv02951
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Pirir
Defendant:
HANAM DAEJI, INC and KANG WON LEE
Bin Kang v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1910
Petitioner:
BIN KANG
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
KO v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
as 2:2022cv06335
Plaintiff:
EUNBIN KO
Defendant:
HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
