Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SCUTELLA v. TRINITY FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
JHEN SCUTELLA
Defendant:
TRINITY FOOD SERVICES, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DEPUTY WARDEN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDLEY v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Petitioner:
JEROME KEON GARDLEY
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, DOCTOR KOHLER, PA KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv02787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DUBOSE et al v. LAPPENS et al
as 2:2022cv02835
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR DUBOSE and ABDUSH DUBOSE
Defendant:
DEPUTY USA LOUIS LAPPENS, AUSA J. JEANETTE KANG, AUSA CASSYE COYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Skaggs v. Jamie Belcher, et al
as 22-1388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL SKAGGS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMIE BELCHER, SCOTT FLANNERY, Sergeant, MACON COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
HUNTER v. BARRETT et al
as 1:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
RON ALLEN HUNTER, JR.
Defendant:
DR. BARRETT, DR. KANG and Z. WAGGONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Manjit Rai
as 22-15002
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MANJIT KAUR RAI, Esquire, AKA Manjit Kaur Kang
Thompson v. Fourth Judicial Complex, The et al
as 1:2021cv03309
Plaintiff:
Sanza Eugene Thompson
Defendant:
Fourth Judicial Complex, The, Shakes, Kang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Leutwyler III et al
as 1:2021cv02782
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Demarcus House
Defendant:
Ben Leutwyler III, Arapahoe County Detention Facility, Eric Kang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
