Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00527
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wood et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
Karen Wood and Jason Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOOD v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP et al
as 1:2015cv00671
Defendant:
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LP and GALAXY INTERNATIONAL PURCHASING, LLC
Plaintiff:
KAREN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WOOD v. STATE COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2015cv00475
Defendant:
STATE COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.
Plaintiff:
KAREN WOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scantlin et al v. Helen of Troy LP et al
as 5:2014cv00963
Plaintiff:
John Scantlin , Terri Scantlin , Weston Golson and others
Defendant:
Helen of Troy LP, Honeywell International Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv07590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood et al v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2009cv00043
Plaintiff:
Karen Wood, Karen Wood, Ricky Wood and others
Defendant:
Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Motorists Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
