Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Prather v. Thomas, et al
as 12-6296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAN DARNTANQUIAN PRATHER
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE E. THOMAS, Judge, JODIE I. GAGE, Attorney, PAYNE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Prather v. Thomas
as 5:2012cv01148
Defendant:
Katherine E Thomas
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Gage et al
as 5:2012cv00953
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Jodie L Gage and Katherine E Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv00945
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Katherine E Thomas, Phillip Corley, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv00951
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Katherine E Thomas and Tom Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Palm Beach Tan, Inc.
as 1:2012cv02927
Plaintiff:
Katherine Penn Thomas
Defendant:
Palm Beach Tan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Prather v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv00917
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Katherine E Thomas, Jodie L Gage, Payne County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv00875
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Katherine E Thomas and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Social Security Administration
as 5:2012cv00064
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Katherine F. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Akpan v. Texas Board of Nursing et al
as 1:2010cv00669
Defendant:
Jena R. K. Abel, Board Members, Lance R. Brenton and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Uko Akpan
ALJ-SOAH:
Sarah G. Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
