Cases 1 - 10 of 512
Marquez v. Baker-Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Marquez
Defendant:
Amber Baker-Chavez, Elizabeth O-Rourke, Gerard Lavelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mendez Palacios v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02061
Petitioner:
Gregori Jerson Mendez Palacios
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Amadi v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02060
Petitioner:
Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendez Palacios, Gregori Jerson v. Heckard
as 0:2024cv60419
Plaintiff:
Gregori Jerson Mendez Palacios
Defendant:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McMahon v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02057
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph McMahon
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lozano-Bustos v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02036
Petitioner:
William Lozano-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gray v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02035
Petitioner:
Da'Eon Gray
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fessel v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02015
Petitioner:
Greg Fessel
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rankin v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Katina Marie Rankin
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02001
Petitioner:
Webster Douglas Williams, III and Webster D. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
