Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Donald Jackson v. Grant Harris, et al
as 16-3865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
Grant Harris, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Kay Howell, Head Warden, Benton Unit, Judy Taylor, Assistant Warden, Benton Unit and others
Jackson v. Harris et al
as 4:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Donald Jackson
Defendant:
Grant Harris, Kay Howell, Judy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henri Hatten v. Richard Vinyard, et al
as 15-3707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Henri Dubois Hatten
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard Vinyard, Supervisor; Benton Work Release Center, Kay Howell, Warden, Benton Work Release Center and Marvin Evans, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Hatten v. Vinyard et al
as 4:2015cv00459
Plaintiff:
Henri Dubois Hatten
Defendant:
Richard Vinyard, Kay Howell and Marvin Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffey v. Harris et al
as 5:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Kenny Coffey
Defendant:
Grant Harris, James Banks, Mark Cashion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grissom v. Smith et al
as 5:2013cv00045
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elisha Grissom
Defendant:
Randy Smith, Michael M Lowe, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. White et al
as 5:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Wesley Elisha Grissom
Defendant:
Latricia White, James Gibson, Kay Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oldham v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00348
Plaintiff:
Steve Oldham
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Kay Howell, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Howell et al
as 4:2012cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Kay Howell, Tiffany Burton and Kenall Tabor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
