Cases 31 - 40 of 332
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr.
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Terry Raybon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Ivey et al
as 1:2023cv21482
Plaintiff:
Marcus O Tate and Marcus O. Taite
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alberto Millian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkle v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. McDough
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Gary E. Walker
Defendant:
Chris McDough and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddis et al v. Hamm et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Q. Hamm, Steve Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McConico v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
James McConico, III
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Debra Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peden et al v. Gwathney et al
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Terry Henderson Peden and The Law Group of THP, PLLC.
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Dwayne Spurlock, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
