Cases 1 - 10 of 19
James v. Guiterriez et al
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Michael C James
Defendant:
David Guiterriez, Ressie Owens, Paul Keil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. TX Board of Pardon
as 22-40765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Hicks
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Board of Pardon and Paroles, each member in official capacity, David Guiterriez, Chairman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Ressie Owens, Chairman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Schulz et al v. The City of La Vernia, Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Joshua Schulz and Yvonne Schulz
Defendant:
The City of La Vernia, Texas, The City of La Vernia City Administrator, The City of La Vernia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis Keil v. Timothy Hooper, Warden
as 19-30617
Petitioner / Appellant:
CURTIS ANTIONE KEIL
Respondent / Appellee:
TIMOTHY HOOPER, Warden
Keil v. McCain et al
as 2:2018cv09410
Plaintiff:
Curtis Antoine Keil and Curtis Antione Keil
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boone v. Bowie County Texas et al
as 3:2018cv02438
Defendant:
Matt Keil, Michael Bernoudy, Tina Petty and others
Plaintiff:
Edward C Boone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MDG - RIO V Limited v. City of Seguin, Texas et al
as 5:2018cv00882
Plaintiff:
MDG - RIO V Limited
Defendant:
Don Keil and City of Seguin, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magic Leap, Inc. v. Keil
as 4:2018cv00133
Plaintiff:
Magic Leap, Inc.
Defendant:
Todd Keil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sibley v. Blue Buffalo Company, LTD. Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 4:2016mc00031
Movant:
Gary Sibley
Respondent:
Class Action Plaintiffs from Missouri case (Alexia Keil, etc.) and Blue Buffalo
Keil v. Hanson
as 2:2015cv00422
Plaintiff:
Curtis Antione Keil
Defendant:
Ray Hanson
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
