Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Latefah Shampine v. Jeffrey Bell, et al
as 23-3576
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATEFAH SHAMPINE
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY KEITH BELL, PENNY COUSPER DAINEL, MAGISTRATE RICHARD GEDEON and others
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant:
Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Shampine v. Bell et al
as 1:2022cv01753
Plaintiff:
Latefah Shampine
Defendant:
Jeffrey Keith Bell, Penny Cousper Dainel, Magistrate Richard Gedeon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bell v. McColley Quarter Horses, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DR. KEITH BELL and Keith F. Bell
Defendant:
McColley Quarter Horses, LLC, Travis McColley and Nichole McColley
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bell v. Lewis et al
as 4:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Carl Coy, Mike Lewis and Anthony Davis
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Keith Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Maglinger
as 4:2018cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Keith Bell
Defendant:
Jailer Art Maglinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Caught My Eye Photography et al
as 2:2018cv00961
Defendant:
Caught My Eye Photography and Worthington City School District
Plaintiff:
Keith Bell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Diageo Americas Supply, Inc. v. Bell
as 3:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
Diageo Americas Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Keith Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
Keith Bell
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bell v. Romanowski
as 1:2007cv14481
Petitioner:
Keith Bell
Respondent:
Kenneth Romanowski
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
