Cases 1 - 10 of 211
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv06216
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE JOSEPH F. LEESON, ANDREW POMAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keith Davis v. Jeffrey Schmehl
as 24-3017
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL
United States of America v. Davis
as 1:2024cv08637
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Whitetail Ridge Trust CTO et al v. Benge et al
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Whitetail Ridge Trust CTO and Heavens Door Trust CTO
Defendant:
John Joseph Benge, Dr Keith Davis, Traci Thrap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. Brian Davis, Jr.
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brian Keith Davis, Jr.
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE TRACY BRANDEIS ROMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Truck Relocating Services, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Keith Davis
Defendant:
Truck Relocating Services, LLC, Team Drive-Away, Inc. and Jackie R. Poarch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Davis
as 24-20058
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Keith Davis
Keith Davis v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
