Cases 1 - 10 of 12
REAVES v. MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN REAVES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY, JOANNE JORDY, GEORGE KAPALKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rose v. Coley et al
as 3:2020cv00713
Defendant:
Ruthie Carpenter, Kenneth Barnes, Tommy Pugh and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Mitchell v. Constantino
as 1:2017cv03328
Plaintiff:
Keith Mitchell
Defendant:
Brianna Constantino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES v. MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2016cv03127
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN REAVES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, MCELROY, MULVANEY, DEUTSCH & CARPENTER, LLP, MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aid Names Being Fictitious, The Persons Intended Being Those Who Aided And Abetted The Unlawful Con:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Mitchell v. Connecticut Region 14 District Probate Court et al
as 3:2014cv00630
Plaintiff:
Lynne Mitchell
Defendant:
Connecticut Region 14 District Probate Court , Jennifer L. Berkenstock , State of Connecticut Probate Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
