Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Rose et al v. Gold Bond Co LLC et al
as 3:2026cv02979
Plaintiff:
Keith Rose, Douglas Rose and Diane Harris
Defendant:
Gold Bond Co LLC, Block Drug Company, Inc., Chanel Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rose et al v. Block Drug Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2026mc80099
Plaintiff:
Keith Rose, Douglas Rose and Diane Harris
Defendant:
Block Drug Company, Inc., Gold Bond CO LLC, Chanel Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Rose v. Schulte
as 4:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Keith Rose
Defendant:
Robert Schulte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chadd Morris v. Jerry Worley, et al
as 21-2109
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYANT MAYS, KEITH ROSE, MITCH KESSLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADD A. MORRIS
Salinas v. Rose Medical Management, LLC, d/b/a Rose Medical Management et al
as 2:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Rose Medical Management, LLC, d/b/a Rose Medical Management, J. Keith Rose and Rose Medical Management, LLC doing business as Rose Medical Management
Plaintiff:
Olivia Salinas
DeAndre Daniels v. Jeremie Seymour, et al
as 20-2692
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON CHENOWETH, Security Therapist Aid, KEITH ROSE, Security Therapist Aid, EBONY BERRY, Security Therapist Aid and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEANDRE DANIELS
ROSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84758
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rose v. USA
as 1:2020cv00872
Petitioner:
Keith Rose
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chadd Morris v. Jerry Worley, et al
as 19-3209
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYANT MAYS, KEITH ROSE, MITCH KESSLER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHADD A. MORRIS
Thomas Powers v. Gregg Scott, et al
as 19-2483
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH ROSE, CURTIS PARSONS, LYNNE SHELTON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.