Cases 1 - 10 of 779
Tatum v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Kelley Jerrell Tatum
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Sheriff Kelley Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv02024
Petitioner:
Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sheriff Kelley Martinez and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00323
Petitioner:
Christopher Kelley
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelley v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00295
Petitioner:
Christopher Kelly and Christopher Kelley
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelley v. Dixon
as 2:2023cv00588
Petitioner:
Joseph Matthew Kelley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Kelley v. Lundy
as 2:2023cv01167
Petitioner:
Tshombe M Kelley and Tshombe M. Kelley
Respondent:
Lee Ann Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. Mims
as 1:2023cv02734
Petitioner:
Frederick D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troy Kelley v. David Brewer
as 23-15801
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY X. KELLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID BREWER, Warden
Kelley v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Margaret Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
