Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. C.M.C.F. Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Pruitt
Defendant:
C.M.C.F. Staff, Mississippi, C/O Robinson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddy v. Mandy et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Eddy
Defendant:
Unknown Mandy and Unknown Kelley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Hawkins et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
James C Bell
Defendant:
Unknown Hawkin, Randy Lavespere, Kelley Hawkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Kelley
as 3:2018cv00690
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Frank Demetrious Patton
Defendant:
Darla Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashlock v. Kelley et al
as 5:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Keith Ashlock
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Robert Page, Rodney Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Chapman et al
as 3:2017cv00929
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Unknown Chapman and Management & Training Corp., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Management & Training Corp., Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00843
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., Inc., Unknown Hodges, Unknown Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Kelley v. J. Buscher, et al
as 16-60694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BUSCHER, sued in his Individual and Official capacities, INVESTIGATOR ALEXANDER, LIEUTENANT JONES, Disciplinary Hearing Officer (D.H.O.) and others
Kelley v. Hogan et al
as 3:2016cv00576
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
N. Hogan, Unknown Jones and Trinity Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
