Cases 11 - 20 of 780
Kelley v. Smith
as 4:2023cv00434
Petitioner:
Margaret Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Damien Ford v. Dexter Payne
as 23-1875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Damien Ford
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelley)
Nadhim v. Beckhelm
as 3:2023cv00746
Petitioner:
Ihab Kifah Nadhim
Respondent:
Kelley Beckhelm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kenneth Kelley v. William Bohrer
as 23-6179
Petitioner:
KENNETH KELLEY
Respondent:
WILLIAM S. BOHRER, Acting Warden and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kelley v. Fikes
as 2:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Frank D. Kelley
Respondent:
Warden Jeffry Fikes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelley v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2022cv00767
Petitioner:
Susan Marie Kelley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelley v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv23873
Plaintiff:
Susan Marie Kelley
Defendant:
State of Florida and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Kelley v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01777
Petitioner:
Troy Kelley and Troy X. Kelley
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Haley Galbreath v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Haley Galbreath
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelley)
Stanley Nelson v. Dexter Payne
as 22-2674
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stanley Isaac Nelson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction (originally named as Wendy Kelley)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
