Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Michael Wahba v. Kellogg Company
as 13-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WAHBA
Defendant - Appellee:
KELLOGG COMPANY
Thomas v. Kellogg Company et al
as 3:2013cv05136
Plaintiff:
Patty Thomas, Jennifer Dowling, Kelley Dye, Jr and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Company, Kellogg Sales Company, Kellogg USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wahba v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2012cv06975
Plaintiff:
Michael Wahba
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Van Hoey v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 3:2012cv08055
Plaintiff:
John Van Hoey
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America, Kellogg Company and Kellogg Company Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Dailey v. The Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2012cv00040
Plaintiff:
Elaine Dailey
Defendant:
The Kellogg Company and The Kellogg Company Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Love v. Kellogg Company
as 2:2012cv02165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Love
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615
Schenkel v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2011cv00350
Plaintiff:
Sheri Schenkel
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Kellogg Company Welfare Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kelvin Haywood v. Life Insurance Company of North America et al
as 2:2011cv05209
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Haywood
Defendant:
Kellogg Company Employee Welfare Benefit Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America
Luna v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2011cv02175
Plaintiff:
Pedro Luna
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Daily v. Kellogg Company Welfare Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2010cv00060
Defendant:
Kellogg Company Welfare Benefit Plan, Life Insurance Company of North America and Cigna Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Elaine Dailey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
