Cases 41 - 50 of 213
Davidson v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2018cv01104
Plaintiff:
Martha Davidson
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williamson v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Cameron International Corp., Industrial Holdings Corporation f/k/a Carborundum Company, Brand Insulations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Stokes v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Deirdre Stokes
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lemieux v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2018cv00682
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Plaintiff:
Winnie Julianne Lemieux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chapman-Phelps v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01275
Plaintiff:
Mary Chapman-Phelps
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC and Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marotto v. Kellogg Company et al
as 1:2018cv03545
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marotto
Defendant:
Kellogg Company, Kellogg USA Inc., Kellogg Sales Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Principle Packaging LLC v. Kellogg Company
as 1:2018cv00448
Plaintiff:
Principle Packaging LLC
Defendant:
Kellogg Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Heeman et al v. New Prime, Inc., et al
as 4:2018cv00433
Plaintiff:
Kevin Heeman and Derrick Walker
Defendant:
New Prime, Inc., , Bobby Robinson and Kellogg Company
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
Bobby Robinson , Kellogg Company and New Prime, Inc.,
Counterclaim_defendant:
Kevin Heeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Kellogg Company et al
as 2:2017cv01914
Plaintiff:
Jay J. Ammer, Andrew Brown, Richard Bush and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Company and Kellogg Sales Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
