Cases 11 - 20 of 514
Kelly v. American Bar Association
as 5:2024ct03047
Plaintiff:
Steven Kelly and Steven James Kelly
Defendant:
American Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Avens v. Dixon et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cynthia B. Avens
Defendant:
Faris C. Dixon, Jr., Vidant/ECU Health Medical Center, Dr. Karen Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Porter v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02030
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. City of Charlotte, North Carolina et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Brent J. Kelly
Defendant:
City of Charlotte North Carolina, Marcus D. Jones and Jason M. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Clemens v. FCI Butner - 2
as 5:2023ct03360
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
FCI Butner - 2, L.B. Kelly, Ms. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02021
Petitioner:
Gencis Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Defendant:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02005
Petitioner:
Iklas Davis
Respondent:
Warden Lynne Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
