Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lanham v. Fenwick-Smith et al
as 1:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lanham
Defendant:
Robert Fenwick-Smith, Bruce Coventry, Kenneth Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Miller v. Lanham et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Patrick Allen Miller
Defendant:
Kelly Lanham, Blaire Watkins and Prime Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Lanham et al
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Patrick Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Kelly Lanham and Ofc. Blair Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook, Jr. v. Lanham et al
as 5:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Kelly Lanham and Aaron Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copen v. Lanham
as 5:2022cv00135
Petitioner:
Jesse James Copen
Respondent:
Brian/Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Copen v. Lanham
as 3:2022cv00078
Petitioner:
Jesse James Copen
Respondent:
Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Field, Jr. v. Jividen et al
as 5:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe, Betsy Jividen and Bryan Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00280
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00804
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chambers et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sheena Hill, Wayne Eric Hopper, Patricia L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
