Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kelly Raymond v. Louisiana State, et al
as 17-30893
Petitioner - Appellant:
KELLY RAYMOND
Respondent - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE and KEITH DEVILLE, WARDEN, WINN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 4:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Sarah Kelly Raymond Wilson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , John Doe Corporation and Vickie V. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. Louisiana State
as 2:2016cv16047
Plaintiff:
Kelly Raymond
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond v. Warden LaSalle Correctional Center et al
as 2:2013cv06449
Plaintiff:
Kelly Raymond
Defendant:
Warden LaSalle Correctional Center
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kidd v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv00097
Defendant:
Edward Babington, City of New York, John Does 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Kidd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. Pledger
as 3:2008cv01725
Plaintiff:
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Kelly Raymond Pledger
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DT v. Tacoma School District 10 et al
as 3:2007cv05184
Plaintiff:
DT
Defendant:
Tacoma School District 10, Pat Erwin, Luann Kucklick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
DT et al v. Tacoma School District 10 et al
as 3:2007cv05185
Plaintiff:
DT, Moena Trammel and Gregory Trammel
Defendant:
Tacoma School District 10, Pat Erwin, Luann Kucklick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
