Cases 1 - 9 of 9
State of New York ex rel. Ken Elder v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
State of New York ex rel. Ken Elder
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. KEN ELDER v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. KEN ELDER
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Not Classified By Court:
KEN ELDER
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
STATE OF NEW JERSEY EX REL. KEN ELDER v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2021cv19462
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY EX REL. KEN ELDER
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
State of Minnesota ex rel. et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 0:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Minnesota ex rel. and Ken Elder
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. KEN ELDER et al v. U.S. Bank N.A.
as 1:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Ken Elder and STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. KEN ELDER
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of California ex rel. Ken Elder v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Ken Elder
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
State of Illinois Ex. Rel Ken Elder v. JPMorgan Chase N.A.
as 1:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. KEN ELDER
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & D, et al v. G3 Analytics, LLC
as 19-1807
Not Yet Classified:
KEN ELDER, G3 ANALYTICS, LLC, COHEN LAW GROUP, P.C. and others
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. et al v. G3 Analytics, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02114
Petitioner:
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd. and Cohen Law P.C.
Respondent:
G3 Analytics, LLC and Ken Elder
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
