Cases 1 - 10 of 41
ADAMS v. HEAD et al
as 1:2021cv02670
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRIS HEAD, JOHN EOFF, MARY JEAN CREAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Brewster et al
as 4:2019cv01267
Defendant:
Probation Officer Pat Brewster, U.S. Attorney Kenneth Magidson, Harris County Clerk Stan Stanart and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Eugene Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Patrick of the family of Morgan v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv01208
Petitioner:
Patrick of the family of Morgan
Respondent:
Lynn N. Hughes, Kenneth Magidson, Jennifer Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chisholm v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2017cv00211
Plaintiff:
Vivian F Chisholm
Defendant:
United States Navy, Lancelot Chester Coley, Richard Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bruce v. Atlas et al
as 4:2017cv00070
Petitioner:
Kenneth Robert Bruce
Defendant:
Nancy Friedman Atlas, Kenneth Magidson, Charles Escher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Atlas et al
as 4:2016cv03794
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robert Bruce
Defendant:
Nancy Friedman Atlas, Kenneth Magidson, Charles Escher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trowbridge, Jr. v. Lew et al
as 4:2016cv02747
Plaintiff:
John Parks Trowbridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Jacob Joseph Lew, Department of Treasury, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02609
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Barraza v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv01072
Plaintiff:
Herman Barraza
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and Kenneth Magidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
