Civil Rights Cases
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff: JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant: JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant: KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff: Chris Jaye
Defendant: United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02399
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES, MERICK B GARLAND, CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL A CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
O'Diah v. Benton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01854
Defendant: Hewlet-Packard, LT Wheels, John Koskinen and others
Plaintiff: Aror-Ark O'Diah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diane Gochin v. Thomas Jefferson University, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2260
Plaintiff - Appellant: DIANE R. GOCHIN
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY, CARIANNE P. TORRISSI, Esq. (Individually and in her capacity as an officer of the court), JUDGE ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, (Individually and in his official capacity) and others
Thomas Noble v. Kent Jordan
as 17-1146
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant / Appellee: KENT A. JORDAN
Thomas Noble v. Kent Jordan
as 17-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant - Appellee: KENT A. JORDAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?