Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Williston v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Williston
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 8:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Browning v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv03293
Plaintiff:
William Browning
Defendant:
Ralph Alexander, John C. Bumgarner, Jr., Janet S. Wong and others
Keppler v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv06641
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brandon Keppler
Defendant:
Allied Trust Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dhatt v. Enviva Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
TAJE DHATT
Defendant:
Enviva Inc., John K. Keppler, Michael A. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Keppler v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05994
Plaintiff:
Mark Keppler
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Strasser, Jr. v. State of Oregon, et al
as 23-35422
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD KENNETH STRASSER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, by and through Governor Kate Brown, in her individual capacity, KATE BROWN, in her individual capacity, SHELLEY HOFFMAN, State Risk Manager and others
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. Keppler
as 1:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Brian J. Keppler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Fagen v. Enviva Inc. et al
as 8:2022cv02844
Plaintiff:
David Fagen
Defendant:
Enviva Inc., John K. Keppler and Shai S. Even
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 di - Removal - Civil Rights (Disability Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
