Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Hill v. Rudd, et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Rudd, F/N/U Porter and F/N/U Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Ross, F/N/U Steward, F/N/U Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Porter et al
as 2:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron Porter, Captain Green, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20700
Plaintiff:
KEVIN TODD HILL and KEVIN HILL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2022cv02351
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center, Kirk Fields, Correctional Deputy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2021cv00603
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Hill
Defendant:
Galipeau, Aramark Inc and IDOC Grievance Process Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Kevin Hill
as 21-5275
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN D. HILL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hill v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Kevin James Hill
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Hill et al
as 3:2020cv03580
Plaintiff:
Samuel Amezquita Morales
Defendant:
Kevin Louis Hill, Ashley Distribution Services, Ltd. and Ashley Distribution Services Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2020cv02513
Defendant:
Sgt. Harris, Ofc. Watlans, Ofc. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
