Cases 1 - 10 of 85
CARTER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Defendant:
ANTHONY CARTER, ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN M. KRAUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHI v. MCGEEVER et al
as 2:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
XIRUI SHI
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCGEEVER, COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
HARVEY v. FOLLY et al
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
HOLLY HARVEY
Defendant:
KEVIN M FOLLY and SHANNON A ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
CAMP EL et al v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2022cv01773
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEE REGINA CAMP EL and GRAND WAZIR HARUN BEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and KEVIN M. KRAUS
JONES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. JONES and JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOCAL 159 AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. KRATON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
KRATON CORPORATION, DAN F SMITH, SHELLY J BAUSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CHOWNS FABRICATION & RIGGING INC.
as 5:2021cv03543
Plaintiff:
CHOWNS FABRICATION & RIGGING INC. and KEVIN M. CHOWNS
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7434
HOPKINS v. LUMINEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02618
Defendant:
STEPHEN L ECK, DIJUANA K LEWIS, LUMINEX CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. SYNACOR, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01296
Defendant:
LISA DONOHUE, HIMESH BHISE, CLP SY HOLDING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
