Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Moten v. LaSalle Corrections et al
as 6:2015cv00376
Defendant:
James Duke, Stacy King, La Salle Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wayne Moten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
GRIER v. WILSON et al
as 5:2015cv00165
Plaintiff:
LASHAWN DANGELO GRIER
Defendant:
THOMAS H WILSON, RICHARD MILLAM, MARK DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Powell v. T. Bickell, et al
as 13-3126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
TABB BICKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Powell v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02455
Plaintiff:
Kevin Powell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, T. Bickell, James A. Eckard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWELL v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv06238
Petitioner:
KEVIN POWELL
Respondent:
T. BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Powell v. Joe Fisher, et al
as 12-3974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE FISHER, Supt. for Facility Management, HANNAH, Deputy for Facility Management, WHITESEL, Deputy for Facility Management and others
Powell v. Fisher et al
as 1:2012cv01684
Plaintiff:
Kevin Powell
Defendant:
Joe Fisher, Deputy Hannah, Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Powell v. DR. Symon
as 10-2157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
SYMONS, Dr.
Powell v. Anderson
as 6:2010cv03138
Petitioner:
Kevin Powell
Respondent:
Marty C. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Suggs v. Marshall et al
as 2:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
Tyson Joiel Suggs
Defendant:
John Marshall, Kevin Powell, Craig Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
