Cases 81 - 90 of 574
O'Meara et al v. Priceline Logistics LLC et al
as 4:2022cv03147
Plaintiff:
Douglas O'Meara and Lindsay O'Meara
Defendant:
Priceline Logistics LLC, Prime Moving and Storage LLC and Khaled Awad
Khaled Hawary v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv04869
Plaintiff:
Khaled Hawary
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Diomande v. Solomon et al
as 9:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Khaleed Diomande
Defendant:
Gabriel Solomon, Caleb Gomes and Ms. Brook Blaze
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
KHALED et al v. BOWERS
as 1:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
MD RUHUL AMIN KHALED and AMINA ALI
Defendant:
WILLIAM BOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHAKFEH v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2022cv01710
Plaintiff:
KHALED OUSAMA SHAKFEH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Williams v. Esmah Investment Group LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Leanne Williams
Defendant:
Esmah Investment Group LLC and Khaled Alnehmi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ibrahim v. Suptho, Inc.
as 5:2022cv03239
Plaintiff:
Khaled Ibrahim
Defendant:
Suptho, Inc., Sean Lattimore, Jr. and Joshua Simoncic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
