Cases 41 - 50 of 350
Jones v. Emmons
as 1:2021cv05076
Petitioner:
Kiel Dion Jones
Respondent:
Warden Sean Emmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mangino et al v. Cascade Village Park Phase II Condominium Home Owners' Association et al
as 2:2021cv01463
Plaintiff:
Ginger Mangino and Marc Mangino
Defendant:
Cascade Village Park Phase II Condominium Home Owners' Association, Gregory Davidson, Tony Kiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cole v. Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC et al
as 8:2021cv03468
Plaintiff:
Kiel Cole
Defendant:
Ascend Performance Materials Operations LLC and Ascend Performance Materials Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARKLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60532
Plaintiff:
KIEL BARKLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiel v. Hudgins
as 5:2021cv00168
Petitioner:
Keith Anthony Kiel
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KIEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59074
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KIEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41318
Plaintiff:
KIEL E OWEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Kiel Jackson
as 21-5778
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KIEL JACKSON
VAUGHN v. KIEL et al
as 3:2021cv15194
Plaintiff:
LAMONT VAUGHN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE EDWARD KIEL, MARGARET ANN MAHONEY, PATRICK HATTERSLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Senne, et al v. Office of the Commissioner of, et al
as 21-80091
Respondent:
AARON SENNE, MICHAEL LIBERTO, OLIVER ODLE and others
Petitioner:
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, ALLAN HUBER SELIG, KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
